joomla templates
A+ R A-

News Events

Positive Developments in Singapore-Indonesia Cross-Border Restructurings

01 November 2021


Singapore has grown into one of the leading jurisdictions for international debt restructuring. This has developed synergistically with its position as an international financial centre and preferred venue of international dispute resolution, particularly with the Singapore International Arbitration Centre, the Singapore International Commercial Court, and the Singapore International Mediation Centre. The recent reforms to Singapore’s insolvency and restructuring framework have allowed Singapore to compete with other leading global restructuring and insolvency jurisdictions such as the U.S., the U.K. and Hong Kong.

For the most part, in its push to become a leading regional and global restructuring hub, Singapore is very receptive to foreign companies restructuring their debts in Singapore. The IRDA allows unregistered foreign companies to be wound up if they have a “substantial connection” to Singapore. Recent case law has shown that the Singapore courts are willing to adopt a flexible test to determine whether a foreign company has a “substantial connection” with Singapore.


On Indonesia’s part, the courts have, for many years, generally been slow in recognising foreign judgments and have emphasised the principle of national sovereignty in refusing recognition of foreign judgments and arbitral awards. However, in a recent development, judicial attitudes in Indonesia appear to be changing.


This update includes a look at the Central Jakarta Commercial Court’s decision in PT Bank Maybank Indonesia Tbk v PT Pan Brothers Tbk (Judgment No. 245/Pdt.Sus-PKPU/2021/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst), and the growing trend of Indonesian companies utilising Singapore as their centre for restructuring.

If you would like information or assistance on the above, you may wish to contact the Partner at WongPartnership or Lubis Santosa & Maramis whom you normally deal with or the following:


Manoj SANDRASEGARA
Partner
d +65 6416 8106
e This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
Click here to see Manoj's CV

     

Rando PURBA
Partner
d +62 856 1085 470
e This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
Click here to see Rando’s CV.

Lawrence FOO
Partner
d +65 6416 2467
e This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
Click here to see Lawrence's CV

Gerald Saratoga SARAYAR
Associate
d +62 812 9464 3934
e This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
Click here to see Gerald’s CV.



https://www.wongpartnership.com/insights/detail/positive-developments-in-singapore-indonesia-cross-border-restructurings

ANNOUNCEMENT

We, LUBIS SANTOSA & MARAMIS (“LSM”), are pleased to announce that we have formed a Strategic Cooperation Alliance with MAKES & PARTNERS (“Makes”) aimed at bringing and combining LSM’s excellence in dispute resolution practice and Makes’ excellence in corporate finance and capital market practice, respectively.

This Alliance will allow both firms to continue to ensure the added value and quality in order to provide comprehensive legal services with utmost integrity. This Alliance is also fully supported by Makes’ Pan Asia Strategic Alliance, Wong Partnership, a leading and highly reputable Singapore law firm with its affiliated offices across various jurisdictions.

A further and official joint announcement by the firms will follow.


LUBIS SANTOSA & MARAMIS

lubis-santosa-maramis

Indonesian Supreme Court Granted An Appeal From Nur Pamudji, Former President Director Of PT PLN (Persero) (State Owned Electricity Company) And Has Acquited Him Of Corruption Charges

Lawyers: Lelyana Santosa (Partner) / Dr. Julius Singara (Partner) / Hamonangan Buddhiwisnu Harahap (Senior Associate) / Yosua L. Situmorang (Associate) / Riska Fadilla (Associate)

We are pleased to announce a very good and encouraging news that the Indonesian Supreme Court has granted an appeal filed by Nur Pamudji, former President Director of PT PLN (Persero) (State Owned Electricity Company), against a decision from the Jakarta High Court to sentence him to 7 years in prison with a fine of IDR300,000,000. The Supreme Court has found that Nur Pamudji’s action does not constitute criminal offense under the prevailing laws:

"By self-adjudication, (Supreme Court) declares that the act indicted has been proven but such act does not constitute a criminal act, therefore the defendant is released from legal charges," said the Supreme Court’s spokesperson Andi Samsan Nganro (MA Bebaskan Mantan Dirut PLN Nur Pamudji - Nasional Tempo.co).

Nur Pamudji was once awarded the prestigious Bung Hatta Anti-Corruption Award for his various policies in building the integrity of PT PLN (Persero). However, later on he was accused by the Criminal Investigations Board of the Indonesian Police Force (Bareskrim Polri) and the Attorney General’s Office for committing corruption due to his policies in the procurement of high speed diesel for electric power plants of PT PLN (Persero) thereby causing losses to state finances even.  This accusation came through besides the fact that Nur Pamudji has not made any personal gain from such procurement process. This is the irony of law enforcement in Indonesia as rightly stated by Judge Suparman Nyompa, S.H., M.H., in his dissenting opinion in the judgment at the first instance, whereas:

“...Defendant Nur Pamudji should have received an award from the state for having endeavoured to use PT. PLN budget as efficiently as possible, but conversely the good intentions and hard work of the Defendant to build and increase productivity of PT. PLN by the efficient use of the budget has brought the Defendant to criminal proceedings and has now been declared as a Defendant”.

The same was stated by High Court Judge Lafat Akbar, S.H in his dissenting opinion in the appellate judgment that:

“In the procurement of Goods/Services of PT. PLN, Defendant Nur Pamudji has factually endeavoured to conserve the use of state finances and has shown an annual average saving of state finances amounting to Rp.351,016,281,301 (three hundred fifty-one billion sixteen million two hundred eighty-one thousand three hundred and one rupiah)...”

To date, we are still waiting for the full text of the Supreme Court’s Judgment.

Source:

South Jakarta District Court Has Granted PT PLN (Persero)’S Demurrer And Rejected Pretrial Motion Filed By The Indonesia Solicitors At Law (Law Firm)

Lawyers: Dr. Julius Singara (Partner) / Doly James Simangunsong, LL.M. (Associate) / Adi Putra Buana Yunara Batubara, LL.M. (Associate)

We are pleased to announce that on 13 April 2021 the South Jakarta District Court has granted PT PLN (Persero)’s Demurrer and rejected a pretrial motion filed by the Indonesia Solicitors at Law.

Previously, on 16 December 2020, the [Indonesia Solicitors at Law] has filed a pretrial motion against:

  1. The Government of the Republic of Indonesia c.q. Chief of National Police of Indonesia c.q. Chief of Greater Jakarta Metropolitan Regional Police c.q. Chief of South Jakarta Subregional Police c.q. Chief of Kebayoran Baru Sector Police as Respondent I;
  2. The Government of the Republic of Indonesia c.q. President of the Republic of Indonesia c.q. Ministry of State-Owned Companies c.q. PT. Perusahaan Listrik Negara c.q. Aji Lesmana as Manager of PT PLN (Persero) UP3 Bulungan Jakarta Selatan as Respondent II;
  3. The Government of the Republic of Indonesia c.q. President of the Republic of Indonesia c.q. Chief of National Police of Indonesia as Co-Respondent I;
  4. The Government of the Republic of Indonesia c.q. President of the Republic of Indonesia c.q. Chief of National Police of Indonesia c.q. Chief of  Professional and Security of the National Police (Propam) as Co-Respondent II;
  5. The Government of the Republic of Indonesia c.q. President of the Republic of Indonesia c.q. Chief of National Police of Indonesia c.q Chief of Greater Jakarta Metropolitan Regional Police as Co-Respondent III;
  6. The Government of the Republic of Indonesia c.q. President of the Republic of Indonesia c.q. Chief of National Police of Indonesia c.q Chief of Greater Jakarta Metropolitan Regional Police c.q. Chief of South Jakarta Resort Police as Co-Respondent IV;
  7. The Government of the Republic of Indonesia c.q. President of the Republic of Indonesia c.q. Ministry of State Owned Companies c.q. Zulkifli Zaini as the President Director of PT. PLN (Persero) as Co-Respondent V.

In such pretrial motion, the [Indonesia Solicitors at Law (Law Office)] alleged that Respondent II had committed criminal act of document forgery as intended in Article 263 of the Indonesian Criminal Code and reported the alleged criminal act to the Jakarta Metropolitan Police (Polda Metro Jaya) under the Police Report Number LP/970/II/YAN.2.5/2020/SPKT PMJ dated 12 February 2020 (“LP 970 Case”). Further, on 17 February 2020, the LP 970 Case was transferred to the South Jakarta Sub-regional Police (Polres Jakarta Selatan) for further preliminary investigation. Then, on 16 December 2020, the [Indonesia Solicitors at Law] filed a pretrial motion against the Respondents and Co-Respondents by alleging that the National Police of the Republic of Indonesia has unlawfully terminated the LP 970 Case .  

On 13 April 2021, the South Jakarta District Court decided to “grant the Demurrer of the Respondents” and therefore, “pretrial motion is deemed as unacceptable”.

PT. Gunung Raja Paksi, Tbk. Has Been Declared Under The Suspension Of Obligation For Debt Payment/PKPU

Lawyers: Dr. Julius Singara (Partner) / Doly James Simangunsong (Associate/Qualified Receiver) / Dinda Raihan (Associate) / Insan Fernaldi Lubis (Associate)

PT. Gunung Raja Paksi, Tbk. has been declared under the PKPU based on the Commercial Court Decision at Central Jakarta District Court Number: 432/Pdt.Sus-PKPU/2020/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst dated 25th January 2021. Therefore, all debt payments will be manage collectively with the Administrator Team appointed by the Commercial Court.

LSM Law Firm is appointed by Loesche GmbH and PT. Loesche Indonesia (global market leader in vertical roller mill technology for the cement industry since 1906) for representing them in every meeting related to this PKPU proceeding.

Page 1 of 2

  • «
  •  Start 
  •  Prev 
  •  1 
  •  2 
  •  Next 
  •  End 
  • »